PLEASUREBUSINESSVODAVN AWARDS 2014

Located in: Home > Business > Legal News > Weinstein Makes 'Baseless' Claims Against 'No on B' Committee

Weinstein Makes 'Baseless' Claims Against 'No on B' Committee

The AHF president, sounding nervous, claimed that Measure B opponents took illegal contributions, but evidence shows differently

Weinstein Makes 'Baseless' Claims Against 'No on B' Committee

LOS ANGELES—With a clear tone of desperation in his voice, AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) president Michael Weinstein held a press teleconference this morning to air claims that the No on Government Waste/No on Measure B Committee took illegal foreign campaign contributions from... a US company!

Casting AHF as a "David" facing the "multi-billion-dollar porn industry... Goliath," Weinstein, whose organization takes in hundreds of millions of dollars each year in contributions from, among others, condom manufacturers, claimed at the astoundingly short press conference that the No on Government Waste Committee had received a $75,000 donation on September 13 from "Manwin... a Luxembourg-based porn company," and based on that claim, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Committee charging that the funds represented an illegal contribution from a foreign entity intended to influence an American election. He then stated that the Committee had amended its initial report to substitute a company called Froytal, Ltd. as the donating entity, noting that Froytal was based in Cyprus, making the alleged contribution equally illegal.

ADVERTISEMENT

"So No on B has already admitted to breaking the law by having accepted the largest contribution from a foreign entity," Weinstein charged, though he quickly admitted that the $75,000 had been returned to Froytal... but then proceeded to imply that a $150,000 contribution from Manwin USA, a Rhode Island-based company, was equally bogus.

"Our supposition is that they're hoping that any investigation into where this money came from will take place after the election," Weinstein speculated even having admitted that his organization had no proof that the Committee had accepted any illegal contributions.

"We believe in a level playing field," he concluded. "We believe that people who participate in elections should abide by the laws of this country, and you know, the primary issue we have in this election is the health and safety of performers and safer sex in general. We raise this issue because we're concerned about foreign entities dumping the kind of money in the last few days of this campaign and buying this election with foreign funds, so we would call on No on B to give back this tainted money and to not use it and to not put a possible asterisk over the outcome of this election."

At that point, Weinstein called from questions from the telephonic attendees, but there were none, and the press conference concluded less than five minutes after it began... but the No on Government Waste/No on Measure B Committee was ready with a response—and charges of its own.

"The No On Government Waste Committee, a broad coalition of healthcare, business, entertainment and community groups, responded forcefully to allegations by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation regarding a single contribution coming from Manwin USA, the U.S.-based subsidiary of a global entertainment firm, by calling the charge 'baseless' and 'idiotic' and a shallow attempt to divert attention from the overwhelming community support building against Measure B, the so-called 'Safer Sex' initiative on the Nov. 6 ballot," the Committee stated in a press release issued moments after Weinstein's conference concluded.

"Once again, AHF has ably demonstrated they have no idea what they are talking about with this ridiculous allegation. They are so clueless, they even filed their complaint with the wrong government agency," said James Lee, communications director for the No on Government Waste Committee. "They know the polling as well as we do as voter sentiment throughout the county has turned against them and against Measure B and now they are trying desperately to do anything to save what is arguably the dumbest initiative ever to make a ballot.

"In the beginning of the campaign, a clerical error resulted in a contribution being misidentified as coming from Froytal Services LTD, when in fact it came from Manwin, USA, a U.S.-based firm registered in Delaware, RI," the Committee's response continued. "The error was corrected and all campaign disclosures were updated. Federal and state election law clearly allows for contributions from overseas corporate entities so long as it comes from a subsidiary based and registered in the U.S. As an example, both the Romney and Obama presidential campaigns and related Super PACS have taken in hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions from U.S.-based subsidiaries of foreign companies.

"The irony in AHF citing a campaign violation when it has willfully violated disclosure requirements in not telling voters that former porn actors Darren James and Derrick James were both paid by Yes on B for their endorsements is almost laughable, if it wasn’t so serious," Lee added. "It’s even more pathetic when you consider how AHF has conducted its bookkeeping operations in its own business at the expense of taxpayers."

The No on Government Waste Committee noted that it had come into possession of government audits which showed a long pattern of double-billing and over-charging by AHF that potentially cost taxpayers millions of dollars, including:

• An August 16, 2012 audit by the Los Angeles County Department of Auditor-Controller, which showed that AHF overbilled the Department of Public Health by $1.7 million for contracts worth $8.5 million from January, 2008 to March, 2009. The audit also found about $20,000 in undocumented and unallowable expenditures. The Auditor-Controller has asked AHF to determine the amount of overbilling for subsequent years;
• Two separate audits by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration on August 29, 2006 and February 16, 2010 showed that AHF had billed Medicaid for pharmaceutical drugs that were not purchased or dispensed to patients. The 2010 audit showed Medicaid overpaid AHF by $8,117.42 and the 2006 audit showed that that overpayment was $73,595.80. The agency also fined AHF $3,435.22 in 2010 and $5,000 in 2006;
• In a June 3, 2010, examination by the California Department of Managed Care of 59 claims paid by AHF, auditors found problems with AHF's accounting and billing practices that resulted in AHF underpaying claims submitted to them for medical services provided to policyholders of Positive Healthcare, AHF's privately-owned insurance plan; and,
• On May 13, 2005, the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller found that AHF was double-billing L.A. County and Medi-Cal for the same patients receiving hospice service at the Carl Bean House over an eight-month period from March, 2004 through December, 2004. AHF kept $348,000 in overpayments and refused to repay it to the county and argued that it had been double-billing since 1992 and were entitled to the additional funds due to the low-reimbursement rate from Medi-Cal.

"AHF has a long history of shoddy bookkeeping that has cost taxpayers, and with Measure B it has once again put forth another taxpayer-funded debacle. For a non-profit organization that receives the bulk of its funding from taxpayer-supported Medicare and Medicaid insurance payments, the question should be at the top of every regulator and elected official’s mind, 'Just what the heck is AHF doing with scarce taxpayer dollars?'" Lee said. "If nothing else comes out of this election, a thorough investigation of AHF's books, especially its potential use of taxpayer dollars to fund political activity, should be at the top of every investigator's to-do list."

Measure B, funded and placed on the ballot by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, would require the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health to license and permit adult movie productions in the county and require performers to wear condoms and other "personal protective equipment," and create an unworkable system of on-set inspections and enforcement by county personnel. The county estimates initial start-up costs for the program to be in excess of $300,000, but acknowledges that regardless of the level of compliance by the adult film industry, there would be significant cost to the Department of Public Health.

According to the California Department of Public Health, from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2011, there were 6,447 new cases of HIV reported in Los Angeles County, but only two were adult performers, neither of whom contracted the disease on-set. Since 2004, there have been no documented cases of HIV transmission on an adult entertainment set. In fact, with the industry’s strict testing protocols—requiring testing at least every 14 and 28 days for HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis—adult performers are the most tested workforce in the nation.

If AHF's press teleconference made anything clear, it's that after having sunk millions of dollars into its various "mandatory condom" measures, the organization, and particularly its president, who after all is ultimately responsible for the colossal waste of money that the City and County ballot measures represent, are desperately trying any argument and attack they can make in hopes of swaying the general public to support their ill-conceived agenda.






Related Content:

Free Speech Coalition
Manwin
No on Government Waste Committee
Mark Kernes

Comments

 /
Please log in to comment.
Don't have a free account? Become a member!


By participating you agree to our Privacy Policy & the AVN "Be Kind Policy"
and represent that you are not under the age of 18.

Related Topics







AVN.com